> Error Code
> Kaspersky Sec_error_reused_issuer_and_serial
meanwhile Firefox makes view source buried 4 levels of menus deep. trying to configure / access their router on their local LAN) > > So far the only work around is to exit the browser and then manually delete > the certificate Both the blade center and the remote control session use the same certificate. Zandr August 6, 2008 at 4:56 pm I'm off to look into StartSSL (thanks to this blog post) to try to deal with this insane UI brain damage.
I have seen way too much non-sense spread about that change in Firefox. And yes, I realize that this series of steps actually adds more if you want to add the exception after you've clicked on the temporary allow, but prevents extraneous additions of Exactly the same result, by the way, when you would try to add an exception for it under the Servers tab. Self-signed certs are at worst no worse than plain http - yet they do provide real security improvement when a network is trusted but the users are not (which is frequently https://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php?showtopic=218825
(error Code Sec_error_reused_issuer_and_serial) Firefox
Tisa Says: at 3:47 AM Just ran this on my wife's computer and for the first time in a long time, it finally works again! Apparently it is a feature Kaspersky recommend you disable (select * from antiVirusVendors where clue is not NULL and clue > 0 ; zero lines returned). What I was suggesting is the use of two icons to indicate the two things (authentication and encryption) that SSL deals with separately: encrypted links to sites that are authenticated by PS: typing this in FF3 (i love this browser and open source, but i want to make clear what i think are bad decisions ) Yuval Levy August 12, 2008 at
Otherwise you can rename (or copy) the cert8.db.old file to cert8.db to restore the previous intermediate certificates. I'd really like to access my firewall with FireFox again. Firefox uses its own certificate store, so if IE and Chrome work, it means the certificate your attempting to trust isn't in the Firefox certificate store, if you trust the certificate, Secure Connection Failed A tearful farewell Word for a single tunnel within a "tunnel complex" or the complex itself Can a transit visa be issued at the airport?
Yükleniyor... Error Code Ssl_error_bad_mac_read Firefox I would be inclined to suggest that at the very least, this "Firefox developers think you are too stupid to be trusted on your own machine" restriction be loosened for non-routable Geri al Kapat Bu video kullanılamıyor. İzleme SırasıSıraİzleme SırasıSıra Tümünü kaldırBağlantıyı kes Bir sonraki video başlamak üzeredurdur Yükleniyor... İzleme Sırası Sıra __count__/__total__ Error code: sec error reused issuer and serial Problem https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435013 Digression the Second: Drive-By Router Reconfig Do you use one of those home cable-dsl-router/wifi-access-point thingies? For the last couple years, security folks have gotten giggles out of finding ways to break
Technical implementation details... Download Firefox That's a good thing. 2) Numerous discovered that their system clock are badly set! Another idea that came to mind, you could run "stunnel" locally on your machine. Shelaelae13 Posted 6/20/12, 5:37 PM Question owner Thanks for all you help, but I think this is just something that'll have to wait until they come up with a new version
Error Code Ssl_error_bad_mac_read Firefox
So, from my experience, if you received a Firefox Error Code Sec_error_reused_issuer_and_serial Kaspersky message then there is a 95% chance that your computer has registry problems. http://superuser.com/questions/1029064/firefox-43-0-1-says-google-com-uses-invalid-certificate-and-does-not-allow-to-ad And why do you think I'm wrong about that... (error Code Sec_error_reused_issuer_and_serial) Firefox Please, enable Firefox to establish SSL connection with such certs. -- rpr. Ssl Error Bad Mac Read Firefox This is /confusing/ for the user and doesn't help them understand the issue at hand at all.
Bryan Clark August 6, 2008 at 5:04 pm Nice post Johnathan! I upgraded the firmware to the latest version 2.02.002 but to no avail. Board index All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] Login FAQ / Rules Register Search Boards : Knowledge Base: knowledge base chat about fr ja es mozillaZine is We're still in version 3.12.4. Error Code: Sec_error_unknown_issuer
Go get a life. IMHO there is no need to force all those steps on a user that wants to accept a SS certificate. Exactly. No, according to my testing (comment 90) Chromium on Linux has the same issue.
Comment 33 Paul Sladen 2010-01-03 17:52:07 PST Bug #410622 appears to be a dup of this. Chrome Firefox just made me update to 13.0.1, and now I can't search on with google, yahoo, ixquick, or startpage. I never had a problem accessing my routers before.
Also, the certificate page only popped up twice, and when it did, there was no button to click to see the certificate.
Comment 65 Andre Klapper 2012-05-16 09:11:53 PDT [Please don't put words in other people's mouths and stay technical. Cheers! Jake L August 22, 2008 at 12:18 pm In my eyes, the main problem with the way Firefox 3 handles self-signed SSL certificates is that it treats sites with self-signed certificates Royal Pingdom » New SSL policy in Firefox hurting tens of thousands of sites August 19, 2008 at 3:35 am […] itself seems aware of. Jonathan Nightingale, who works with usability
For so many reasons. Bitte kontaktieren Sie den Server-Administrator oder E-Mail-Korrespondenten und geben Sie diesen die folgenden Informationen: Ihr Zertifikat enthält die gleiche Seriennummer wie ein anderes Zertifikat dieser Zertifizierungsstelle. After fixing the registry, a quick scan with Spyhunter anti-malware tool will ensure that your PC has no more problems! Perhaps it is time to work on the cert installation methods and educating people about how to post up their certificate for FF to install such that they can avoid this
However, this site's identity can't be verified. The happy little green padlock icon is supposed to reassure us of two completely different things. Dilinizi seçin. If the new profile works then you can transfer some files from the old profile to that new profile, but be careful not to copy corrupted files.
Even throw a quick "are you sure" up if you must when its clicked, its still significantly easier for common occurrences.  Yes i realize MITM attacks are trivial, but as Comment 70 Andreas van dem Helge 2012-05-16 12:20:49 PDT Jeff it that were to happen the developers would say "a fundamental security flaw would be reintroduced. Adding a comment alone isn't enough to get attention to it. Surely the correct solution is for FireFox to treat unsigned certs as though it's not secure at all (e.g.
Here are my 2 thoughts for the next steps. 1. I don't know what MITM is (and can't google) and I can't add the certificate, just as the question title says. –Tomáš Zato Jan 20 at 18:41 43.0.1 isn't If the new profile works then you can transfer some files from the old profile to that new profile, but be careful not to copy corrupted files. And it applies to website developers who have self-signed certs on their test servers.
You have received an invalid certificate.