> Java Error
> Java Error During Db2 Version 10 Cm To Nfm
Java Error During Db2 Version 10 Cm To Nfm
All COBOL programs bound to use the Synonym. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. Attachments image003.jpg (<1k) Michael Arlebrandt Application Compatibility in DB2 11 z/OS March 22, 2016 02:06 AM (in response to Chris Hoelscher) Hi, Regarding Dynamic NFM – enabled by APPLCOMPAT zparm set The new DDF_COMPATIBILITY option is: - DISABLE_IMPCAST_JV: Use the pre-V10 server compatibility behavior which is not to implicitly cast input host variables during server host variable bind-in processing.
Best regards Michael Arlebrandt Volvo IT Gothenburg From: Chris Hoelscher [mailto:[login to unmask email] Sent: den 21 mars 2016 22:47 To: '[login to unmask email]' Subject: [DB2-L] - RE: Application Compatibility Customer experiences - 4.Q&A More Where is the BIF? Please make the ** ** appropriate changes and rebind with the SYSCURRENT schema to ** ** use the Version 10 CHAR(decimal) built-in function. ** ** (PM29124 V10 only, usermod V8/V9) ** ** ** ** The system returned: (22) Invalid argument The remote host or network may be down.
Generated Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:34:47 GMT by s_mf18 (squid/3.5.20) In addition, be careful. IT15621INCORRECT RESULT SET COULD BE RETURNED WHEN USING JSON SQL ON TABLE CONTAINING NESTED ARRAYS IT15618IF ARRAY USED IN AN OPEN CURSOR IS MODIFIED WRONG RESULT OR A TRAP ARE POSSIBLE IT17395select against MDC table with a range predicate in SMP might return a wrong result.
You can use the DDF_COMPATIBILITY parameter to enable DB2 10 DDF compatibility with older client drivers. Also see IBM Data Server Driver APAR IC92430. RECOMMENDATION: The remote statement being processed by DB2 contains invalid character data that cannot be implicitly cast. BIF Usage Video (11min:) Presentation Well, a BIF is a Built-In Function such as CHAR, DECIMAL, etc.
This problem is the first one we have had that has been related to the APPLCOMPAT set to V11R1. Watson Product Search Search None of the above, continue with my search II14619: DB2 V10.1 DDF MIGRATION INFOAPAR MVS Subscribe to this APAR By subscribing, you receive periodic emails alerting you PM40872 / UK69946 PREPARATION FOR APAR PM42237 PM42237 / UK69950 An application using IBM Data Server Driver for JDBC and SQLJ Type 4 Connectivity calls a stored procedure with OUT or Some people only see the risks they may be exposed for when installing new maintenance and other see the opportunities to solve problems by installing new maintenance So we’ll see, maybe
Some sections of the documentation did not keep pace with the implemented design, and that is being corrected. Roy Boxwell SOFTWARE ENGINEERING GMBH and SEGUS Inc. -Product Development- Heinrichstrasse 83-85 40239 Duesseldorf/Germany Tel. +49 (0)211 96149-675 Fax +49 (0)211 96149-32 Email: [login to unmask email] http://www.seg.dehttp://www.seg.de We also do the rebind of the packages for dynamic applications at NFM day one to have those running with V11R1 functionality. IT13953ON WINDOWS PLATFORMS, RETRIEVING AN SSL CERTIFICATE FROM THE OS CERTIFICATE STORE MIGHT FAIL FOR CLIENT PRODUCTS IT13952INCORRECT ORDER OF INDEXES GENERATED DURING DB2LOOK PROCESSING IT13910UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS ONE SESSION MAY
This is output every time an SQL statement is PREPARED, or executed, that contains a candidate BIF. http://domscafe.com/java-error/java-error-java-lang-classnotfoundexception.php If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. -----End Original Message----- -----End Original Message----- -----End Original Message----- Attachments image001.jpg (<1k) Myron Miller Pretty conclusive to us. I apologize... (wipes egg off face) Thank you, Patrick Bossman Site Links: View post online View mailing list online Start new thread via email Unsubscribe from this mailing list Manage your
We know this works well for packages, but do we need to change settings for this to make it work for dynamic SQL as well? The statement executed correctly against DB2 9 and below and against DB2 10 CM because those levels do not provide implicit cast support. Another solution is provided by the IBM Data Server Driver. navigate here IT17291TRANSFER OWNERSHIP OF STORED PROCEDURE RETURNS SQL0901N RC=5 WHEN A SYSTEM-PERIOD TEMPORAL TABLE IS INVOLVED IT17290TRANSFER OWNERSHIP OF STORED PROCEDURE RETURNS SQL0901N RC=5 WHEN A SYSTEM-PERIOD TEMPORAL TABLE IS INVOLVED IT17259QUERY
You will need to make sure you areusing a JDBC driver certified for V11. Topic Forum Directory > Information Management > Forum: DB2 for z/OS forum > Topic: DB2 10 CM is rejecting a java timestamp No replies Display:ConversationsBy Date 1-1 of 1 Previous Next I have found some topics about this in the Installation and Migration Guide, the DB2 Commands Reference and the Application Programming and SQL Reference and of course on the IDUG site.
But I know we use a ton of views in our application code (COBOL programs bound) and we’re not having the problems.
We are still running APPLCOMPAT V10R1 in production until we can get the new maintenance rolled into prod. Best regards Michael Arlebrandt Volvo IT Gothenburg From: Chris Hoelscher [mailto:[login to unmask email] Sent: den 21 mars 2016 22:47 To: '[login to unmask email]' Subject: [DB2-L] - RE: Application Compatibility Saved by APPLCOMPAT? In early designs, static and dynamic were separate, but implemented design - the special register is initialized from the bind parameter.
IT16271JOIN-CONDITION RETURNS SQLCODE -338 WHEN TABLE FROM IMPLICIT CROSS JOIN IS REFERENCED IT16257MISSING INFORMATION IN OUTPUT OF CHANGE HISTORY EVENT MONITOR IT16250SQL0818N RETURNED TO APPLICATION WHEN SQL PROCEDURE INVOKED AFTER THE We know this works well for packages, but do we need to change settings for this to make it work for dynamic SQL as well? An entirely separate issue is how EXISTING v9/v10 functions behave in V11 – notably CHAR() VARCHAR() and CAST() If you had no problems in V10, you should be okay in V11 his comment is here Then applied fix to UAT and took applcompat off and the failing MQ message then worked.
In addition, be careful. DDF_COMPATIBILITY options can be specified individually or together. IT16665IN SOME CIRCUMSTANCES REVALIDATION OF INVALIDATED VIEWS MAY NOT SUCCEED IT16660IN SOME CIRCUMSTANCES REVALIDATION OF INVALIDATED VIEWS MAY NOT SUCCEED IT16656SQL0801 AND WRONG RESULTS FROM STDDEV_SAMP, VARIANCE_SAMP, COVARIANCE_SAMP WHEN USED IN The client driver corrects the invalid character data, converting to a numeric, before sending to DB2.
But I know we use a ton of views in our application code (COBOL programs bound) and we’re not having the problems. Regards, Wim Venkat Srinivasan RE: Application Compatibility in DB2 11 z/OS March 21, 2016 08:03 AM (in response to Wim Ruarus) APPLCOMPAT will retain V10 behavior if you bound the (static This option provides such compatibility for all Java IBM Data Server driver level. In addition, be careful.
Or, of course, it could be that you get millions of the things! IT15830JCC GSS-API DOES NOT INVOKE THE DB2JCCPLUGIN FREEPLUGIN() METHOD IN A GSS-API FAILURE SCENARIO IT15827QUERIES CONTAIN EQUALITY JOINS WITH COLUMN OF DIFFERENT DATATYPES AND LIKE PREDICATE MAY EXPERIENCE A TRAP IT15825PORTIONS An entirely separate issue is how EXISTING v9/v10 functions behave in V11 – notably CHAR() VARCHAR() and CAST() If you had no problems in V10, you should be okay in V11 If DB2 Client or DB2 Connect gets SQL1598N after DB2 V10 CM9, review Link of DB2 Connect Documentation to Reactivate the server side license again and follow instructions.
So where’s the BIF? There were so many of these, that IBM introduced a sort of condensed version so it only triggered one for the first execution, or prepare, but sadly that IFCID—376—is only for This is because by default the driver was sending TIME ZONE information to the server. Please see closing text of PM86374 for more details. (2).
ALIAS points to main table and SYNONYM to a VIEW (select all columns from table). But since we can not find user experiences about keeping dynamic SQL (via JDBC) in V10R1, some of the staff still have their doubts. IT15822DEADLOCK ON SYSIBM.SYSTABLES WHEN RUNNING LOAD ON DPF IT15820WITH VARCHAR2-SUPPORTED DATABASE YOU MIGHT GET AN ERROR -305 WHILE PERFORMING AN EXPORT IT15812DB2TS INDEX WITH THE CONTAINS FUNCTION DOESN'T BRING SOME WORDS After upgrading to DB2 10 CM in a test DB2 region, we are getting an SQL -180 when a JAVA (JIS) formatted timestamp (2013-08-23 09:10:00.000000) is sent from a distributed app.